The July issue of Consumer Reports had an interesting article (available on-line) on DIY will-drafting software, specifically, Quicken WillMaker, LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer. The researchers created three different estate planning scenarios — nuclear family, blended family with a special needs child and single with a life partner– then plugged the facts into the software (to the extent that the software allowed them to do so). The resulting documents were then reviewed by Prof. Gerry Beyer, one of the top trust and estates teachers in the country. The best will, which was produced by WillMaker for a nuclear family, was considered good overall, but the software also provided legally incorrect information about whether yet-unborn grandchildren could inherit. Otherwise, the results were adequate at best, and in at least one case, produced a will that was, in Prof. Beyer’s words, “a gold mine for probate litigators.”
What’s the takeaway? That these programs may be cheaper than a lawyer, but they are inadequate for all but the simplest situations. They won’t catch the nuances and problems which an experienced estate planning attorney will identify. Last, the documents produced can result in some very unintended, unpleasant and likely expensive consequences that won’t be felt until after you are dead
Bernie Krooks is one of the smartest and most far-sighted elder law attorneys out there. When he says that Medicare is on the chopping block, I believe it. Delayed eligibility, increased premiums, means-testing — it’s coming — but will the sacrifice be truly shared by those who can afford it most? Or will we continue to tax capital gains well below the rates for earned income?
I’d love to hear about items and ideas you’d like to see posted on this blog. Please respond to this post or send an e-mail to me at email@example.com
According to a study from the AARP, Massachusetts ranks 40th out of all the states in funds expended to support low-income frail elders in their own homes instead of being placed in nursing homes. According to today’s Boston Globe, “if Massachusetts improved its performance to the level of the highest performing state, Minnesota, at least 3,945 nursing home residents with minimum health care needs would instead be able to receive care in their communities.” At the same time, Massachusetts ranks the sixth most expensive place in the country for the cost of privately-paid skilled nursing care.
Although the Patrick administration says that it wants to work towards keeping more elders in the community, MassHealth is openly hostile to allowing parents to pay their children for care, and there is precious little support offered to family caregivers. The bill I testified about last May to give elders the clear legal right to pay their children remains stuck in committee. Further, the state makes it unnecessarily costly to deliver many routine health care services that would allow elders to stay home. Unlike the states that scored the highest for providing home care, Massachusetts law forces families to either hire a registered nurse to change a feeding tube or give a routine injection (like insulin) or do the job themselves, instead of hiring less expensive trained home health aides as is done in states with the highest percentage of frail elders at home.
Unless the public pressures both the Patrick administration and the legislature to improve the delivery and accessibility of community-based care, movement towards such services will remain painfully slow.